Book Review: The Federalist Society: How conservatives took the law back from liberalsVisit: http://csx.sagepub.com/content/45/2/138.extract The United States is in the middle of a mass incarceration era, prompting a strong multi-disciplinary body of literature that explores its collateral ...
The calculus is supposed to be whether the accused poses such a danger to society that he should lose his freedom because of the accusation. Gladwell interviews judges who explain that they make this determination in large part by assessing the demeanor of the suspect during arraignment. And it...
no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society, and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither Force nor Will, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments....
The mission of the Federalist Society is “It is founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not wha...
suggesting that constitutional interpretation appropriately be guided by such standards as whether a public policy "personifies justice" or "comports with the notion of moral evolution" or confers "an identity" upon our society or was consistent with "natural ethical law" or was consistent with some...
Neither the NRA nor the Federalist Society responded to a request for comment. Whitehouse, who took the lead on the filing, said in a statement that the “brief lays out what is increasingly clear to many Americans: a majority of the Supreme Court is acting as if it has been capture...
When there are two sets of laws in a society, there is no law at all, there is only power. John Durham has shown beyond a shadow of a doubt that this is exactly what is going on in the Department of Justice, and if that doesn’t change then nothing else will. ...
they cut to the heart of, not merely Lincoln’s racism, but to the stated reasons for the Deep South seceding from the Union in 1860. The obvious implication of these issues is thatneither Abraham Lincoln, nor almost any of his countrymen, could envision living in a multi-racial society....
The exclusionary rule. .(Debate: Exclusionary Rules)(Federalist Society 2002 Symposium on Law and Truth) 来自 highbeam.com 喜欢 0 阅读量: 19 作者: G Calabresi 收藏 引用 批量引用 报错 分享 全部来源 求助全文 highbeam.com 相似文献"A More Majestic Conception:" the Importance of Judicial ...
The Madisonian Republic and Modern Nationalist Populism: Democracy and The Rule of Law Constitutional Framers did not know in 1788 what exiting the aristocratic and feudal world would mean and what kind of state and society the Republic would become. I argue Madison's contributions to The Federal...